There is an issue with the cache - please click CTRL + F5 to refresh fully and display correctly. Thank you!

UK Inquest Rules Vaccine Cause of Death

Created on: 2022-08-20

Modified on: 2022-12-13

On August 17th, an inquest in the UK ruled that the cause of an individual's death was a covid vaccine, resulting in the first person in the UK receiving compensation for a covid vaccine death.

Zion

The deceased was rock singer "Zion", from Cumbria, who was just 48 years old. His bereaved fiancé, Vikki Spit, was awarded the maximum allowed compensation for his death by the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme.

Zion received his first and only AstraZeneca shot on May 5th 2021. Eight days later, on May 13th, he developed an agonizing headache; on May 15th his fiancé, Spit, called an ambulance for him.

Spit reports that the paramedic who arrived "completely dismissed" any connection between his symptoms and the vaccine, claiming it had developed too long after the jab, and both Zion and Spit believed her.

Zion was recommended to go to hospital for further checks, though declined due to fears of catching covid. Spit added that, "He was prepared to go to hospital if the advice was to do so," though the paramedic denied this.

Zion with fiancé Vikki Spit

On May 17th, another paramedic was called, who described Zion as "confused and vacant". Zion suffered a small seizure, and was taken to Carlisle hospital. From there he was rushed to Newcastle RVI hospital for emergency surgery. On arrival, his pupils were unresponsive to light, and he had bleeding on the brain. Tragically, he died on May 19th.

His fiancé said that prior to receiving the inoculation, Zion was a fit and healthy man who worked out regularly.

Damian Holliman, the neurosurgeon who operated on him, stated at the inquest that he was "fully aware" that Zion's blood clot "was the result of his recent vaccination." Two other consultants who also gave evidence confirmed Holliman's view.

Senior coroner Karen Dilks concluded that "Zion died due to very rare and aggressive complications of the AstraZeneca covid vaccination," but that there was "no evidence that earlier hospital admission would have altered the sad outcome."

Mainstream media reports emphasize the rarity of this side effect, and that the benefits outweigh the risks.

This is a tragic story, nonetheless, to avoid further tragedies it is incumbent on us to ask if the risk to benefit claim is true.

One of the founders of epidemiology, William Farr, stated of epidemics, "The death rate is a fact; anything beyond this is an inference." It is a mistake to focus on one specific cause of death in isolation. What matters is the total numbers of deaths.

As previously reported, the ONS's data for 2021 show death rates for each age category and vaccination status. For the 10-59 year old category, the death rates for vaccinated and unvaccinated are shown below:

Graph showing all cause mortality rates for 10-59 age group, for vaccinated and all other vaccine statuses. From mid-Feb onwards the unvaccinated are at less risk.

All-cause mortality rates * 100,000 by week in unvaxed / vaxed, ages 10-59

As shown, from week 6 (2021) onwards, the all-cause mortality rate is higher among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated - the opposite of the intended outcome.

Can we trust these statistics? They are official government statistics, nonetheless, as previously shown, problems have been found in the data.

In brief, there is a significant unexplained anomaly in the data for this age group meaning we should disregard weeks 1-12 as unreliable. This removes the entire period which shows a benefit from the vaccine.

Next, analysis of higher age groups in the same dataset shows systematic miscategorization of deaths: many deaths among the vaccinated were falsely included among the unvaccinated. This is because, for purposes of estimating vaccine effectiveness, patients were treated as unvaccinated until some weeks after receiving a shot. Whether this is a valid thing to do or not, when judging vaccine safety, all events following vaccination should be considered. Failing to do so takes deaths from the vaccinated group and falsely places them in the unvaccinated group, hiding the risks of any vaccine, and artificially raising its apparent effectiveness. We must assume the same happened to the 10-59 age group.

Therefore, with the information we have available, the best way to interpret this graph is to ignore the first 12 weeks, and assume the true death rate among the vaccinated is higher than shown, and that among the unvaccinated is lower than shown. But even if we take the graph at face value from week 13 onwards, the risks outweigh the benefits, not the reverse, for this age group.

Many people in this age group, like Zion, got vaccinated out of a sense of public service. However, it has been widely admitted that the vaccines do not prevent transmission. Public duty is a good thing, but be aware that propagandists and marketers know that the appearance of this is a psychological trigger - a very effective means of gaining compliance. Note also that the same organizations that profit from the vaccine drive have vested interests in undermining effective and until recently orthodox treatments that make the vaccines an unnecessary risk.

- Antony